Then took a photo of my breakfast ...
... Why?
a. I spent a lot of time {too much time} moving around all the food to make it look pretty {playing with my food} on the plate. At first this was just for my own strange sense of enjoyment {like, it'd taste better if it looked better? you know, making the book cover easy-on-the-eyes so that people judge my book by the cover...}. I realized this masterpiece {relative to the kind of crap I usually create} deserved to be remembered, and I had a camera phone, so why not!?
b. To send a pic to my boyfriend.
...So, uh, then I sent the pic to my boyfriend ... Why?
a. To make him jealous.
b. Bc I was thinking ... that I really like "sharing" my food, but mostly because I'm selfish and "sharing" means I get to try everyone else's food. I mean, I'm ok "sharing" my leftovers. But usually I claim to love "sharing" food to cover up my true intentions of eating as much food in as vast variety as possible in one sitting.
As I was eating breakfast alone this morning, I started thinking about how many meals I have eaten with Ċ½eljko ... most of which have involved some sort of "sharing" - both the part of "sharing" I like and the part I hate. That thought got me weighing the PROs & CONs of "sharing" vs. eating alone. I didn't debate with myself for long, but instead fairly quickly {because aforementioned breakfast was getting cold} decided that I preferred "sharing" over eating alone. {Also, just realized it's probably annoying to my reader(s) for me to enclose the word "sharing" with quotation marks every time I write it. So, that was the last time. I Promise. Well, I'll try to remember.}
Anyway, so I decide that sharing meals > eating alone. And thought I'd share that. You know, to be a sweet girlfriend or whatever.
That effort to communicate sweetness quickly turned into a strangely emotional internal discussion in which I concluded that all things in life are better shared, I think, although I kind of like having my own space & stuff, so maybe I'm an introvert? Nah, no way I'm an introvert. But maybe just a tiny part of me every few months or something is introverted. And, wait, if a bigger part of me was introverted more often, then wouldn't I prefer eating alone to sharing meals? And what would my views on sharing be? Would I be more or less selfish? Slash, wait, I'm sort of being selfish -- ok, really selfish, in sharing meals. Because it's mostly for my pleasure anyway. You know, because of the sharing stuff I wrote about up there, & because I gotta get my people-fix, you know, because I'm an extrovert. Or am I? Aaaaaah.
...Then I stopped the schizophrenic? bipolar? normal? debate going on in my head & tweeted a different pic & a question about breakfast time & election day ...
... Why?
a. To test my fb & tweet buds' bullshitabilities.
b. To see if I could ask a question in the form of a riddle & get a brilliant answer, even with no riddle answer in mind. I assume this is how riddles are supposed to be created?
c. I wanted an excuse to tweet a food pic. People are obsessed with food pics. Granted, I realize the pic I tweeted was less of food than it was a table, laptop, bike & other table. But it's a start, right? The beginning of my food blogging?
Here's the thing about food stuff & me & makin' food & kitchens & whatever ... I, uh, don't, uh, create . . . many meals. I'm actually a tiny bit terrified of the kitchen & everything my being there both entails & implies. The actual cooking stuff part is less terrifying than the deep dark fear I have of all my "barefoot & pregnant" / "woman, you belong in the kitchen" joke references coming to life. More specifically, coming to my life. I should really get over all of that. Or maybe write about it some time. You know, as therapy.
d. 'Cuz I was seriously curious. Ok, this is the only real answer. I was, I promise, curious about what these two times had in common. My initial answer to my quasi-riddle-in-the-making-slash-cry-for-attention was something along the lines of me:
Connecting how little work/time/effort I put into voting & how little work/time/effort I put into breakfast ... r e l a t i v e to everyone truly involved in the process.
So you think that formatting gave that poorly-written sentence a cool effect? Doesn't it seem kinda like I'm quoting myself or some famously profound person? Do you think I consider myself a famously profound person? Errrk, as usual, not the point.
More about that italicized, centered & uniquely spaced thing I wrote above {Yessss, more fun formatting! Bullets this time!}
- Back in my day when I was running for, ahem, political office, {yeah, student government is TOTALLY political and DEFINITELY comparable to what Mitt & Barack are going through!}, I put in so much work/time/effort {here on out, I'll call this W.T.E.} -- not just in getting elected -- but in deciding whether or not to run, in convincing people to (a.) vote and (b.) vote for me & my people & ideas, in following through with the campaign promises we made {when I won}, in responding well to the issues {yes! issues!} I didn't have the foresight to put in my platform, etc. I cared so deeply & sincerely about an unbelievable breadth of issues & knew an exceptional amount of detail about each of those issues. I was a bit obsessed. So obsessed that I don't think I realized, until years later as I quasi-quietly observe the current SLUnanigans happening at my alma mater, how relatively little W.T.E. a majority of students put into Student Government.
- This isn't me calling these non-obsessively W.T.E'd students lazy or apathetic or anything along those lines. Oh! Just realized I want to switch the acronym to W.E.T., & I wanna remove the periods so I can just write WET. Yesssss. Wait, is "work" too similar to / synonymous with "effort"? Hmm. I mean, I guess not. Although, good work involves a lot of effort. Whatever, I'm not changing it now. I'm also deleting this bullet. No, I'm not. Transparency!! Phew, this is a stressful post.
- So non-WET students aren't less ... of anything than WET students like myself. {Holy cow ... so ... many ... inappropriate ... jokes ... to ... make ...}. Non-WET students just had other things to get them WET.
- This is getting weird. I'll stop with the WET stuff.
- I think the point is -- maybe no point at all -- just that it's interesting how relatively little WET I put into election time. And this morning's breakfast has helped me decide that although I'm fairly comfortable with how much WET I put into national elections, I think it's important for me to put more WET into local elections. I'm a bit embarrassed to admit that I did all of my research on local issues last night & this morning {yes, that is BeyondNovember {thanks Nine Network, Saint Louis Beacon & Saint Louis Public Radio} on my laptop screen in that picture above. I'm particularly embarrassed because I know better, dammit! I discovered first-hand how that quote about small groups of people changing the world {Margaret Mead, right? Or Mama T?} is true! I was a part of & in charge of some really exciting changes in my world {my high school & college in these instances}, & I saw all the WET pay off. I was
brain-washed trained at Missouri Girls State to believe in local government. I live in a digital age where I have no excuse {no, not even moving to a new city} not to stay connected to & involved with my local issues. I have no excuse. So what's my deal? Bah! Well, instead of making a ton of excuses about how I don't have time or don't like dealing with the political bologna or whatever, I'm just using this bullet point to commit to myself & whoever wants to be my accountabilabuddy to get more involved in my local government.
Oh yeah ... and breakfast time ...
- The relatively little amount of WET I put into election time is about the same relatively little amount of WET I put into breakfast time. Someone raised that chicken {cage free!} so that someone else could process {or maybe not, bc these are technically organic. Although, I dunno if I even understand what 'organic' really means. Eff this, I'm going to watch Portlandia} the eggs from that chicken so that someone else could sell {at a subsidize rate?} them to, what?, grocery distributors? I haven't even mentioned all the machines & packaging & branding & shipping & storing & cooling & shelving & holllly cow, there's so much involved, so many jobs, so many people, so much money involved in the three eggs I ate for breakfast this morning! And that's just the eggs! Think about the baby tomatoes & cucumber & mushrooms & mini oranges {are these called tangerines?} & milk & water & coffee & utensils & napkins & drinking glasses & serving plate involved! And oh, man, then the phone with which I took a picture & the networks I used to post the pics & phone companies & internet providers & device manufacturers & operating system people & creepy marketers watching my every move so they can sell me their brands of baby tomatoes & cucumber & mushrooms & mini oranges & milk & water & coffee & utensils & napkins & drinking glasses & serving plates!! Ah! I didn't even really do justice to the entire supply chain, & I certainly over-simplified the whole farmers / govt subsidies / etc relationships ... yet, I'm still overwhelmed just thinking about EVERYTHING involved in the most simple and universally encouraged time of day -- breakfast time.
So both breakfast time & election day provide fairly simple opportunities for participation for most people. But a lot, A LOT, of WET goes on behind the scenes. I don't think it's humanly possible {at least not for this human} to drench myself in everything involved with either election day or breakfast time, but in both cases, I could give a little more WET. And if everyone gave a little more WET to both breakfast time & election day, maybe we'd complicate things even more, & I'd regret recommending something like this {I know, I know, this post will likely not 'count' as a real recommendation for many reasons -- mostly, though, because very few people have the endurance to read this much of a silly blog post. Oh! ENDURANCE! That could replace the "energy" part of "WET" ...hmmm...} ...
Or maybe, just maybe, if everyone gave a little more WET than what they're giving now ... maybe the small % of people who are giving all the WET they've got can take a tiny break, & maybe all the WET we're giving -- as a society -- will lead us in a better direction. Maybe?
... Then I decided {just now, actually} to write a blog post about all of this! ... Why? ...
a. No, not because any of my previous breakfast story is a deeply transcending metaphor for elections or for the politicians & propositions & amendments beneath which my chads-are-uh-hangin' {I don't care how old hanging chads references are; I just used one.} ... although, in hindsight, I realize I coulda allegorized the heck outta that story above. Shoutout to Captain Hindsight, btw.
b. Because I haven't blogged in a while, and part of my purpose-o-blogging is to instill some sort of discipline and consistency in myself. Also to get better at writing. Also to eliminate all insecurities I may have about writing to a public audience. Also to smack myself in the face / humble myself every time I check the Google Analytics stats on how many readers I have and realize that 95% of my "viewership" is just me refreshing my browser to make myself feel better. Also because there's a small chance {by "there's a small chance", I actually mean "with 100% certainty}, I am a bit narcissistic {by "a bit narcissistic", I mean, I bet you one-hundred dollars that if I went to a psychiatrist, he/she would diagnose me with NPD} {she writes as she looks in the mirror, winks at herself & pretends an audience of thousands are winking back} ...
Ok, this isn't about why I'm an infrequent blogger! It's about why I blogged about this particular topic today .... uh ... so moving on to letter C. <<<Ohhhh snap, insert Mitt-Romney-fires-Big-Bird-&-Sesame-Street-is-brought-to-you-by-the-letter-C reference here.>>>
c. Because I'm always so dang tempted to blog & tweet & fb & quora & stumbleupon ... all sorts of super relevant cultural references, particularly those political in nature, but truth is -- I'm a huge indecisive pansy! I play it too safe with making my opinions public bc my opinions change basically every other second. Wait, no they don't, every other minute, maybe. See! Changing opinions on frequency of opinion changing! Ah, madness! Anyway, I feel a bit left out, you know? For the last however many annoying months, some chicks have been defriending their sorority sisters whose political views align with someone who differentiates between a legitimate and an illegitimate rape, while some bros have been fist-pumping each others' funny inside jokes about Paul Ryan's widow's peak, while moms have been sending chain emails about the top ten reasons Obama will drive this country into a brick wall or hand-deliver our country "to hell in a hand basket", while dads have been emailing kids about fiscal responsibility and their newfound respect for Joseph Smith's people ... and .... well, you get it. Just a lot of chit chat about these here elections. And I've just been kind of listening quietly {Save your jokes; I'm not that loud}, hoarding articles and personal chicken scratch notes, watching debates {mostly to see how spot-on SNL impersonations are}, yada yada. But no epic / public posts from me -- at least one taking a strong stance in any one direction or another. No, this blog post isn't going to be that either. I told you! I'm indecisive! Or am I undecided? Or indecided? Or undecisive? Hokay, that was just to exaggerate the point. I am indecisive, and I was technically undecided until I actually voted. At which point, I became a decided voter. Whoah. That's grown-up feeling. Adulthood, here I come! Crap, I'm tangenterizing my post again!
It doesn't matter; I'm done w reasons for doing things. Now, I just feel like responding {in David Letterman Top Ten Format, for you, dad} {I didn't say these would be as funny as DL's ... just that the format is similar} to my morning Tweet...